The National Register
licensed bookmakers on the register
as at 19 September 2026 · verified against ACMA and 8 state and territory registers · updated daily
e.g. online bookmakers, Northern Territory, the full register
Licence verified
Every listing is checked against the ACMA register and state and territory licensing registers, with a last-verified date.
Complaint pathways
The correct regulator and complaint route for every operator — start at our complaints navigator.
No promotions
We publish licensing facts and factual feature comparisons only — no inducements, no promotional content, no odds, no tips.
Bureau determinations
How the lists workApproved / Recommended — the Bureau's only positive determination
Recommended status is the Bureau's highest assessment tier, determined solely by published criteria. It cannot be purchased, and it is withdrawn immediately on any watch or avoid listing.
Avoid — confirmed misconduct
The full avoid list (28)Significant misconduct confirmed by a regulator, court or the operator's own admission. Never allegations alone. Listed operators can respond, and entries are removed when the matter is resolved.
- Bet Alpha
2024-04-02 — The Victorian Gambling and Casino Control Commission fined MintBet $100,000 for accepting bets from an individual displaying indicators of distress that may be related to problem gambling, and for failing to have appropriate systems in place to help ensure vulnerable individuals do not experience a loss of control from their gambling. The finding is against Mintsports Pty Ltd, the licence holder for this brand, so it applies to every brand operating under that licence. The VGCCC records that its decision to take disciplinary action is currently before VCAT for review. (VGCCC)
- Bet Buzz
2024-04-02 — The Victorian Gambling and Casino Control Commission fined MintBet $100,000 for accepting bets from an individual displaying indicators of distress that may be related to problem gambling, and for failing to have appropriate systems in place to help ensure vulnerable individuals do not experience a loss of control from their gambling. The finding is against Mintsports Pty Ltd, the licence holder for this brand, so it applies to every brand operating under that licence. The VGCCC records that its decision to take disciplinary action is currently before VCAT for review. (VGCCC)
- Bet Dragon
2024-04-02 — The Victorian Gambling and Casino Control Commission fined MintBet $100,000 for accepting bets from an individual displaying indicators of distress that may be related to problem gambling, and for failing to have appropriate systems in place to help ensure vulnerable individuals do not experience a loss of control from their gambling. The finding is against Mintsports Pty Ltd, the licence holder for this brand, so it applies to every brand operating under that licence. The VGCCC records that its decision to take disciplinary action is currently before VCAT for review. (VGCCC)
- Bet Nation
2026-07-27 — The Northern Territory Wagering Commission fined Bet Nation owner Amused Australia $38,556 for breaches of responsible gambling obligations and marketing rules, and ordered repayment of $30,161 to a customer after finding the bookmaker failed to adequately respond to signs of gambling harm and continued sending promotional messages after an unsubscribe request. (The Straight)
- Betchamps
2026-01-29 — The ACMA concluded an investigation finding that BetChamps failed to comply with gambling self-exclusion rules designed to protect consumers who registered with BetStop. BetChamps was issued a formal warning by the ACMA, with the regulator noting that failure to comply with self-exclusion rules in the future may result in stronger enforcement action including Federal Court proceedings. (ACMA)
- BetDeluxe
2026-07-27 — The Northern Territory Racing and Wagering Commission fined Amused Australia Pty Ltd — the licensee that operates this brand — $38,556 for breaches of responsible gambling obligations and marketing rules, and ordered it to repay $30,161 to a customer, after finding it failed to adequately respond to signs of gambling harm and continued sending promotional messages after an unsubscribe request. The finding is against the licence holder, so it applies to every brand operating under that licence. (The Straight)
22 more on the avoid list.
Watch — open matters
The full watch list (6)Open regulatory action or substantiated adverse reports from the Bureau's daily media monitoring. Every entry carries its dated, sourced evidence.
bet3652026-07-04 — AUSTRAC found "serious gaps" in Bet365's anti-money-laundering controls and risk systems, requiring the company to enter an enforceable undertaking to strengthen its anti-money-laundering and suspicious transaction reporting processes. (The Nightly)
- Betfair
2026-06-04 — The Times reported that the family of Luke Ashton, who died by suicide in 2021 aged 40, is suing Betfair for over £800,000, claiming the bookmaker breached its duty of care and that the death was linked to gambling addiction; Betfair is defending the claim and denies encouraging bets or materially contributing to the death. (The Times)
- Chasebet
2026-04-16 — The Australian Communications and Media Authority issued Chasebet a formal warning for failing to promote BetStop in three marketing emails and on its website, in breach of gambling self-exclusion rules. After ACMA alerted the company, Chasebet rectified the issue, though ACMA warned it would take further enforcement action if breaches occur again. (The Straight)
Sportsbet2026-08-04 — Tim Costello, an Alliance for Gambling Reform advocate appearing before a Senate Inquiry, accused Sportsbet of paying for flights and escorts for problem gamblers and asking them about drug use to exploit vulnerabilities, according to reporting by the Australian Financial Review. Luke Bateman, a former heavy gambler, also alleged that a sports betting company (unnamed in his account) provided drugs at VIP events and asked him in advance what drugs he wanted available. (Letsgohorseracing)
- Topbet
2025-01-01 — An ACMA investigation found that Betsmarter Pty Ltd, trading as Topbet, contravened Part 7B of the Interactive Gambling Act by sending a regulated electronic message to an address where it was reckless to the fact that the address belonged to an individual registered with the BetStop National Self-Exclusion Register. The ACMA issued a formal warning. (ACMA)
- Winners
2026-03-05 — The ACMA found that Winners Bookmaking Pty Ltd (trading as Betplay) failed to close a wagering account in a reasonable timeframe for a customer who had registered with BetStop – the National Self-Exclusion Register. The company was issued with a formal warning, with potential for further enforcement action including financial penalties or Federal Court proceedings if breaches occur again. (ACMA)
Online bookmakers
All online bookmakers on the registerEvery Australian-licensed online wagering operator, exchange and totalisator — verified against the ACMA and state registers.

Twelve kinds of bookmaker
Compare allBy state and territory
counts as at 2026-09-18The Bureau Gazette
View the Gazette →






